Why do acne scars look worse in some lighting and in photos?

Acne scars are visible mainly through shadow rather than colour. A depressed scar contains no pigment of its own, so what you are seeing is the small shadow cast within it. Changing the direction and quality of the light changes that shadow, which is why the same scars can appear barely noticeable under one lighting source and severe under another.

Light coming from directly above strikes the face at a steep angle and casts a shadow within every depression. Bathroom downlights, lift ceilings, changing room spotlights and office strip lighting are all overhead and all directional, which is the least favourable combination for atrophic scarring. Diffuse light from a large source, such as an overcast day or light reflected from a pale wall, fills these depressions and can make the same scars almost disappear. Neither view is the true one, however the diffuse view is considerably closer to how other people see you.

The way that photographs are taken can also introduce distortion. A front-facing phone camera uses a short focal length and is usually held close to the face, which exaggerates surface irregularity. Flash photography tends to flatten texture, whereas a photograph taken in daylight at arm's length is generally the most representative. Magnifying mirrors are the least representative of all, since they present the skin at a distance from which nobody else will view it.

This matters because acne scarring is graded partly according to whether it is visible at conversational distance under ordinary lighting. Scarring that is apparent only in a magnifying mirror under a spotlight is mild by that standard, even though it does not feel mild. The distress it causes is real and is a legitimate reason to seek treatment, but the assessment of severity should not be made under the least favourable conditions available.

For this reason I would advise choosing one location with soft, indirect daylight and judging your skin there. If you are following the effect of treatment, photographs should be taken in the same place, at the same distance and in the same light on each occasion, since otherwise it is impossible to determine whether anything has changed. This is particularly relevant when assessing how much improvement to expect or whether a treatment has worked.

Book a Consultation

Related Articles

Dr Magnus Lynch

About Dr Magnus Lynch

MA(Cantab) DPhil(Oxon) MRCS FRCP

I am a London-based Consultant Dermatologist and Dermatological Surgeon. I am highly experienced in skin cancer diagnosis, Mohs micrographic surgery, acne, rosacea, acne scarring and laser treatments. I studied at the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford, and completed my dermatology training and Mohs fellowship at the prestigious St John's Institute of Dermatology. I graduated from medical school in 2003 and have worked exclusively in Dermatology since 2012.

I lead a research team at King's College London investigating the molecular biology of skin cancer. In recent years I have been involved in Media Appearances, including the Channel 5 series 'Skin A&E', where I perform skin surgeries and treat various skin conditions.

My NHS practice is at Guy's Hospital. I consult with private patients at OneWelbeck (near to Bond Street station) and on Harley Street. Book A Consultation.

Book Consultation

I am available for consultations at several sites in Central London. Some conditions such as acne and rosacea are also suitable for a remote consultation with photos. Either enter your details and my practice management team will contact you within 1 working day or use instant online booking. Alternatively you can call or email directly. Please note that not all open clinic slots are visible on the instant booking link.

Central London • Harley Street
Mon – Fri, 9am – 5pm

Request a Callback

★★★★★ 108+ verified patient reviews • Callback within 1 working day

or
Book Online Instantly
Call Book Consultation